OBSERVATORY 21 September 2026 Federal

Tenant access for repairs, what the Swiss court said

On 22 July the Federal Supreme Court held that a tenant cannot block a necessary repair to freeze the evidence. Article 257h sets two duties on the landlord in return.

By the Envergure editorial team

A tenant who can feel a dispute coming may be tempted to leave the damage untouched until the evidence is secured. The Federal Supreme Court has just ruled that this kind of caution does not postpone maintenance work.

FEDERAL

Scales of justice, symbol of a court decision Ruling 4A_218/2025, handed down on 22 July

The Federal Supreme Court issued ruling 4A_218/2025 on 22 July 2026. The September 2026 tenancy law newsletter put it back into circulation, which is how it reached letting agents and tenants.

The question behind it lands in agency inboxes every month. Does a tenant have to let the contractors in when the landlord wants to repair something? It is settled by article 257h of the Swiss Code of Obligations, which the court applied here, and whose full text is published by bail.ch.

One clarification before going further. This is federal law, so the rule applies in the same way in every canton, and no canton can soften it for its own buildings.

art. 257hSwiss Code of Obligations
22.07.2026date of the ruling
4A_218/2025Federal Supreme Court reference

Question mark, symbol of a common question Can a tenant refuse access for repairs?

No, not when the work is needed to maintain the property. The tenant has to put up with it, and article 257h sets two duties against that, the landlord gives notice in advance and spares the tenant's interests while the work goes on.

The argument the court turned down is worth a pause, because it sounds reasonable. Wanting to preserve evidence for a dispute still to come is no legitimate ground for blocking necessary repairs, as the bail.ch newsletter sums it up.

What the ruling balances

  • Work needed to maintain the rented property, which is a different thing from a refurbishment decided to lift the value of the building.
  • Advance notice from the landlord, before the contractors turn up at the door.
  • Care for the tenant's interests for as long as the work lasts.
Information circle, symbol of a key fact
The point to keep. Wanting to hold on to evidence does not justify blocking a necessary repair, even with a dispute brewing.

Wrench and screwdriver, symbol of maintenance work Keeping your evidence without stopping the work

The ruling closes one door and opens none in its place. What is left is practice, less dramatic than refusing entry and far sturdier in front of an authority.

For the tenant

  1. Photograph the damage before the work starts, keeping a readable date on the files.
  2. Write to the landlord describing what was found, and say that the photographs exist.
  3. Have the state of the flat formally recorded when the sum at stake warrants it, instead of refusing access.

For the landlord

The right to enter is prepared, not declared. Giving notice of the work in advance and keeping the disruption down are the two conditions article 257h attaches to the tenant's duty, and a dated letter beats a phone call on the day a conciliation board reads the file.


FEDERAL

Bar chart, symbol of rent movements Are asking rents rising faster than sitting rents?

Yes, and the gap explains part of the friction around building work. In the second quarter of 2026 asking rents rose 2.4% over a year while rents under running leases gained 1.1%, according to figures published by Properti.

These numbers come from a commercial player rather than a statistical office, and the method behind them is not spelled out. They give the order of magnitude, not a precise measure.

Swiss rent movements over one year in the second quarter of 2026Change over one year, Q2 2026Asking rents2.4%Sitting rents1.1%
Twelve-month change in rents asked on reletting and in rents under running leases, second quarter of 2026. Source Properti.

A flat that changes tenant is relet for more than a lease that simply carries on. That is the backdrop to maintenance disputes, and the 22 July ruling takes one argument away from anyone hoping to buy time behind a closed door.

Also worth reading

And your property, in this market?

Get a free estimate in two minutes.

Value my property →